Forex robot proof

Posted by Louis on January 11th, 2009

Forex trader schemes have had a bad reputation in the past , mainly because the products availabe were all made in pdf formats and were nothing more than rewritten gambling advice , and the truth was you really needed to be a mathmatician to understand the probaility factors that affect trade prices and be near a phone or computer to constantly monitor the rise and falls on currency.You would also need to buy newspapers constantly to monitor foriegn news so as to accurately judge a rise and fall in price .

The majority of failures were due to inability to commit to that kind of commitment.

Forex boomerang robot review garatantee

Not any more tho’

Click logo for more

Now with the forex robot system , it trades without you needing to know these things, quite simply it uses a complex algorithm to mark trends and when at a reasonable peak it will sell , and when at a trough it will buy. It does this millions of times per second so you don’t even have to be awake

  1. no human monitoring
  2. trading does not stop because you re in bed
  3. uses complex algorithms at the speed of light ( fibreoptics)
  4. sells immediately on price downturn
  5. Does not need to speculate on political issues

I personally speculated in stock and shares and almost always made a bundle , I also dable in gold prices, and in the euro and dollar speculation .The latest downturns in dollar , and sterling have increased my portfolio by a third.

Watch this guy make $640 in 2 days

Forex boomerang robot review garatantee

vg

Click this logo for more

As you can see by the graphs , the system is simple and cannot be replicated by humans , maybe except those with big brains.

This is the age of automation , speculation is another form of gambling, watch the video and see just how simple this system is,

You will be amazed!

Working from home, financial help

Posted by Old Nick on January 9th, 2009

Working from home can be a very difficult thing to achieve , but now thanks to thwe internet we can do this with relative ease .

Although we can easily publlish sites we have to compete with the great many other sites and people in the same position and will to do the same as us .

This is an example of what you do NOT want

It smells like MLM and may be or not , but “downlines” , and “signed under me” are a good indicator of pyramid schemes.

Career opportunities can very tough , especially now with the economy in the state it is in , and we need to cover all possibilities of financial restoration . So few markets are available to the common person , but we have possibly the greatest economy at our fingertips , and as with any economy , even in a downturn , there are allways people who are doing well and making a profitable enterprise.

Largely by geographical diversity , economies can be self sustaining on one extreme, and severely slowing on the other .One thing is always for sure, people will always have a will to survive.

For example , a short time ago a study was made that concluded that the ammount of insurance fraud had tripled , and this was large due to the scarecity of regular income and a windfall of cash was needed , and enter the insurance scams .From as little as claiming for household damage , to as much as arson.

Plan to save us from the slump part2

Posted by Old Nick on November 3rd, 2008
In the 18 months or so before the next election, Mr Brown may be able to increase that lead. The public mood of concern over our collective economic future is hardening into anger against the bankers and City dealers whose imprudent and risky loans and trades caused the current crisis. That generates an additional problem for the Conservatives, because bankers and City dealers are perceived by the public as archetypal Conservative figures. Mr Cameron and his party risk being seen by the electorate as part of the economic problem, rather than its solution.

The Tory leader must therefore put Labour in the frame: Mr Brown profri-ised “an end to boom and bust” but pursued an economic policy built on a huge bubble of private and public debt; he set up a City regulatory structure that proved to be woefully inadequate when the good times ended.

George Osborne’s proposals for an overhaul of the banking sector, which we report today, should also be persuasive. On the public finances, he would introduce ah independent watchdog to make sure the government balanced its books, and could not run up debts on the scale that Gordon Brown has done. On the private sector, Mr Osborne says that he would introduce a “Debt Responsibility Mechanism” that would require banks to put more money aside when profits are high so that they can deal with the inevitable years when profits are replaced by losses. He would give the Bank of England the power to issue official warnings to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) that banks are lending too much money too freely, a measure he says would “lead to the FSA tightening up the capital requirements on individual banks”. He also proposes to reform the FSA itself, so that its staff come from the City, and are paid for by the City. “The poachers”, he insists, “will have to pay for the gamekeepers.”

Mr Osborne’s proposals should indeed place banking and City dealing on a less fragile foundation. But they alone will not be enough to convince the electorate that the Conservatives can rescue the economy and champion the public interest. To do that, Mr Cameron will have to provide an alternative vision of Britain to the creeping corporatism espoused by Labour and Gordon Brown. He will have to demonstrate that he has the wisdom to steer the ship of state through the economic storm. But he will also have to show that he can devise a new social contract that does not have the major defect of the present arrangement: while the vast profits of City bankers and dealers are left to them to enjoy, their even more stupendous losses are picked up and paid for by the rest of us.

If Mr Cameron succeeds in those tasks, he will show that he is no “novice”, but rather the man who should be Britain’s next prime minister.

Plan to save us from the slump

Posted by Old Nick on October 29th, 2008
Politicians bicker about how to rescue it, but almost everyone with any knowledge of the economy is agreed on one central point: we stand poised on the edge of an economic precipice. If we fall into it, the consequences will be dire, and may involve a prolonged slump of the kind not seen since the 1930s: mass unemployment, new levels of homelessness, and a severe global contraction of trade, consumption and production.

The desperate desire to avoid this scenario is why the US Congress is likely to endorse the $700 billion taxpayer-sponsored “rescue package” for the country’s beleaguered banking system. It also explains why here in Britain, the Government is ready to take Bradford & Bingley into state ownership, a year after it did the same to Northern Rock - which means a Labour government that famously declared “the era of nationalisation is over” has ended up owning some of Britain’s biggest banks. To top it off, the first indication of what will happen as the crisis hits the high street can be seen with the collapse of MFI.

David Cameron, the leader of the Conservative Party, will speak to his party’s conference this week against this background of profound anxiety over the state and future of the economy. The stakes are extremely high. The days when the polls assured Mr Cameron of a landslide win in the next election may be drawing to a close. The problems with the economy have, paradoxically, helped Labour: our poll reveals today that Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling are trusted by fractionally more of the electorate to negotiate the country through difficult economic times than are Mr Cameron and George Osborne, the shadow chancellor

 

RECESSION 2008

Posted by Louis on October 20th, 2008

Well here we are , it’s official .2008 is teh begininning of the recession!

Household finances store spending and housing will not recover for at least 3 years , and then not to last years levels . What level will they be? Who can say. Maybe 2002 levels .

Sorry Myself , I run out of work in the summer 2005 and decided if there was no work for me as a builder then there was something definitely wrong .I felt the economy slow , though public opinion was there was nothing wrong , but I was not the only one to feel it! So i sold my house and looked to reinvest , feeling that market was topped out , thought he housing market was still to rise for another 18 months ! I lost out , but better to lose a little and be on top , than stuck!

As with any business , when you see the sales drop , wjhether you work in a shop , factory , warehouse, or office , when the sales slow , look out . I’ve found people convince them selves nothing is up , when it obviously is , so why deny ? Well I think the human condition forces people to hope , as the majority hate change , of any type ,and we all crave stability.

Lessons for the future are that do not forget , the signs , and don’t dismiss the downturns in the economy . I made out like a bandit on both downturns , why? it was so obvious, why could no one see it?

I always remember things I heard years ago …Things are always as they seem……what goes up must come down.

Consumer spending was the main drivers of Tony blairs’ and Gorgon Browns’ economy , they rode the economic success and taxed the excess , we thought we were richer , but we weren’t. The more we earnt the more we were taxed , stealthily , and the government borrowed , and sold half our gold reserves and spent that too!!! Do you feel raped ? You bloody should ! Gordon had the cheek to say government borrowing was only marginally higher than the previous government , really were’s our bloody gold then , were have you spent all the tax money?

The Labour socialist based goverment as always , are economically inept , and reckless , having creamed us so much , we now are broke and scrapping by, but guess what, theyn still need the money , for their projects and whatever , so now , struggling as we are ,we are being squeezed for every penny they can get.

Consumer spending fuelled this disaster , those that wanted to reflect a life they did not deserve,or could they sustain , same as it was in the 90’s under Mrs Thatch , though she curtailed the events , shrply and painfully , and I was back earning money within a year. These fools though , I’ve not really worked for 3 years , nor can I invest my money , neither can I expect to work within the next 2 years!

Now Gordon wants us to start spending again to revive the economy! what an arse , we have no spare money, no job stability , negative equity , competition from migrant workers working cheaper than us ,( and not being consumers but rather savers,) .That’s not going to work , fix the econmy , raise interest rates to 8% at least , attract foreign money and investment , yes some people will lose their homes, some people and businesses will go bust , but it is not about individuals , it is about the whole ,and our recovery , and the sooner we can recover the better position we will be in dominate the world.

Or shall we just wait 6 years for the rest of the world to fix themselves and we can ride their tails to economic recovery, by then all of the best business people will have left to better shores.

But of course he would not do that , because it would cost votes and popularity , come on be a Dad not a mate , do the proper thing not mess us up for life ……you putz

So why did they lie about the state of the economy for so long? Who knows , do you? If so tell me…

Financial instability in China , threatens our recovery

Posted by Louis on October 19th, 2008

Financial instability in China threatens our recovery in the West , we hoped they would save our economy , unlikely now ,the deck of cards collapses further.

The impor­tant, though not publicised, showl of China’s wellbeing was in the currency-futures market, which now prices in a 4.5% fall in the value of the yuan against the dollar over 12 months.
The defeat for the strong-currency policy promoted to China by US Treasury , Hank Paulson, who boasts of his leadership ties forged dur­ing 70 visits to Beijing on behalf of Goldman Sachs.
The yuan has strengthened by more than 20% against the dollar since 2005. Halting its rise is the one sure way to restore a cost advantage to exporters, although it would infuriate China’s trade partners in Europe and America.
This crisis has already cast doubt on fundamental assump­tions about global trade, though, and presents China’s leaders with another serious domestic challenge.
Their propaganda triumph at the Olympics was overshad­owed by riots across Tibet, ter­rorism in the Muslim far west and an earthquake that killed 60,000 people. There were also scandals over fake or contami­nated goods, most recently milk products tainted with melamine that have killed and hospitalised many children.
Now their main claim to legitimacy — a strong economy — is under pressure as Chinese stock markets have fallen more than 60% while real estate in the nation’s most liberalised city, Shenzhen, is down by 40%.

Critics at home have openly challenged their policy of investing dollar reserves in US Treasury bonds. China holds $519 billion, second only to Japan, which has $593 billion.
These investments kept US interest rates low, funding the sub-prime mortgage boom and the war in Iraq. For China, though, they could turn out to be a bad deal.
Most ordinary Chinese are unaware that foreign-exchange reserves are not free assets but represent liabilities against domestic currency issued by the central bank to “sterilise” dollar inflows earned by exporters. Even so, public opinion does grasp that every percentage point fall in the value of the dollar against the yuan represents a loss for China in its own money.
There is also angry popular debate about state-directed for­ays into foreign acquisitions, such as loss-making invest­ments in Morgan Stanley, the US investment house, and For-tis, the recently nationalised European bank.

Hopes for China to save our economy

Posted by Louis on October 13th, 2008

China today, boarded up factories and redundant employees tell of how the world credit crisis may end the export miracle and bring huge threat to eco­nomic reforms since they started 26 years ago.
Bankruptcies and unemploy­ment are climbing, while politi­cal pressure is mounting from the left on policymakers. Some officials are openly challenging the export-driven model that led China to stack up foreign reserves of $1,800 billion (£1,060 billion). There has been little effort to cover up the dis­tress, perhaps because of rival­ries between factions of the Communist party.
China Central Television, for example, recently broadcast a report prepared for the cabinet saying that 67,000 companies have gone bankrupt in the first half of the year and 20m work­ers have lost their jobs.
The latest phase of the crisis, in which stock markets fell sharply across Asia, forced the authorities to reverse policy by cutting interest rates and restor­ing subsidies to exporters.
However, the most impor­tant, if understated, signal of China’s response came in the currency-futures market, which now prices in a 2.5% fall in the value of the yuan against the dollar over 12 months.
That is a defeat for the strong-currency policy urged on China by US Treasury secre­tary Hank Paulson, who boasts of his leadership ties forged dur­ing 70 visits to Beijing on behalf of Goldman Sachs.
The yuan has strengthened by more than 20% against the dollar since 2005. Halting its rise is the one sure way to restore a cost advantage to exporters, although it would infuriate China’s trade partners in Europe and America.
This crisis has already cast doubt on fundamental assump­tions about global trade, though, and presents China’s leaders with another serious domestic challenge.
Their propaganda triumph at the Olympics was overshad­owed by riots across Tibet, ter­rorism in the Muslim far west and an earthquake that killed 60,000 people. There were also scandals over fake or contami­nated goods, most recently milk products tainted with melamine that have killed and hospitalised many children.
Now their main claim to legitimacy — a strong economy — is under pressure as Chinese stock markets have fallen more than 60% .

Twenty million workers lose their jobs

Posted by Louis on October 12th, 2008

We hoped China would save our economy with cheap imports , curbing our inflation , even though , billions of dollars per year would go abroad . China treasury , made public statements about how to run banks to avoid ecomomic failure.

Now it appears even they are not immune . Though it was plain to see that an economy with a high interest rate and high inflation (7.5%) would not be long term sustainable .

Sharp growth is always laiden with the risk of sharp collapse . slow built , sound economic , businesses will always stand the test of time.

Out of some 6,000 shoe facto­ries in the Pearl River Delta, 2,331 have gone bankrupt, according to a trade magazine.
One in five small or medium-sized enterprises in Zhejiang have also gone under, said the Securities Daily, a business newspaper.
Scenes of angry workers and creditors besieging the prem­ises of the Golden Sun group were shown on local television, which reported that its boss, Zhang Zhengjian, had fled owing almost £100m.

Wang Jie, an economic analyst in Shanghai. “I forecast that a third of small and medium-sized enterprises in the export sector will go bankrupt by the second quarter of 2009,” he added.
In the export-orientated provinces of Guangdong, Zhe-jiang and Jiangsu, the slow­down has already cut a swathe through businesses.

And last week the China Youth Daily told the story of how an employee, Xiao Gao, showed up early for work at the biggest printing and dyeing group in Zhejiang to find the
offices stripped of computers and strewn with documents.
Police were looking for the owner and his wife, who are reputed to owe £85m to state-owned banks and a further £57m to the institutions known in Chinese as “underground banks”.
The latter, which levy interest at up to 40% a year, have proliferated in a land­scape of commercial despera­tion despite the fact that Chi­nese businessmen fear their sin­ister figureheads and their dras­tic methods of debt collection.

Wang Jie, an economic analyst in Shanghai. “I forecast that a third of small and medium-sized enterprises in the export sector will go bankrupt by the second quarter of 2009,” he added.
In the export-orientated provinces of Guangdong, Zhe-jiang and Jiangsu, the slow­down has already cut a swathe through businesses.
Out of some 6,000 shoe facto­ries in the Pearl River Delta, 2,331 have gone bankrupt, according to a trade magazine.
One in five small or medium-sized enterprises in Zhejiang have also gone under, said the Securities Daily, a business newspaper.
Scenes of angry workers and creditors besieging the prem­ises of the Golden Sun group were shown on local television, which reported that its boss, Zhang Zhengjian, had fled owing almost $2OOm.

A significant fall in exports, leading to more unemploy­ment and company failures, could intensify unrest . That is why economic reformers are striving to avert a sharp slow­down.
In August, produc­tion of fridges fell 14% compared with a year earlier, said Huo Dufang, chairman of an industry asso­ciation. Output of air-conditioning units fell 7.7% and of microwave ovens by 6.5%, he said.
“As more and more dropped countries run into a financial crisis, China’s export: contract exponentially,” Wang Jie

While you were out , we built a house in your garden..

Posted by Louis on September 9th, 2008

After the  upset caused by the conservative government , the british people decided to vote in the labour government .

And why not?  Everyone had forgotten what they were like !  And they made some great promises.

Though , fundamentally , they are socialist , and everything that goes with it .

It doesn’t matter what the promises a party makes ,they will always be governed by their principle beliefs , they just tell you what you want hear , and the labour party , are the kings of spin !

As will all fascists , the ” you do what we say , we know best” attitude , leaves people with a bitter taste.

They started in 1998 with the  surveys of residents gardens , on the assumption that it is unfair for the masses , the  largest working class populus, have little or no garden , so why should some people live in luxury , with square footage that they don’t really use , when that area can be put to huge  use . Why grow grass in an area where you can grow human beings?

They decided the countryside should not be touched and should belong to all citizens, to wander , use , and damage , as they feel like.  The right to roam.

All new houses , must have the government recommended size plot for efficiency and maximisation. Hence the small gardens  we have now . To increase these plot sizes will result in the unexplained refusal of planning consent .No more streets of big houses , with the big gardens ( like the  4 that  commandant Adolf Blair  owns).

Peferential permission given to people who wish to tear down their house and build “efficiency apartments” in their place, or to those who wish to build another house in their garden.

Preserving of the countryside for the amusement of townies , with new building being constantly refused , even if it meets the government guidelines for plot size.

The labour party wants everyone to live in small efficient apartments ,shelter ,cooking and sleeping areas.( this didn’t work in the  60’s and 70’s so why would it work now?).

The forcible , compulsory buy of gardens  , and recreational areas , and car parks , to build houses and flats , to squeeze people into small , densely packed, towns .This reigns efficiecy for buses and schools and shopping ,and local workplaces ( also resolves the problem of the majority of people who travel more than 30 mile to work each day).

Well  ,Tony Stalin, you overlooked many things …..people are private , they like space from their neighbours.

They like gardens , especially if they have children.

Bad influence from the neighbours young , will cause the developing young to be easilly corrupted into a behaviour that is group obsessed (Decartes) , and indepedent , because of the need to belong to a group , leading to unruly youth , and consequently requiring a higher authoritarian state to manage.

Regardless of the competition with the neighbours , people want to succeed and drive themselves to achieve a type of life they will like , very often money driven . This still requires long travel to better paid work , or work in the chosen fields .

These policies, strip away the fudamental desires  , or at least make the chosen goal that many aspire to , unobtainable , leading to a growing populus of lethargic , unmotivated individuals , and so their offspring too.

Are the inner city poor areas a hotbed of community , and positive social interraction?

Do they produce well rounded , emotionally competent , with clearly defined positive social parameters, educated and aware , to interact and succeed  with all walks of society and become useful , productive members of society ?

Or the discontent , rabble , wandering gangs , with no use , the plague of society. These people I can feel sorrow for , the vicious cycle of  apathetic humans breeding the same , with no goals , low education , and peers ,skewed versions of society ,unable to see a life different to their own ,leading the rabble to new depths, solely for commaradery. Ultimately unable to break free , with personality issues that will exclude them from ever being a member of the “good life”.

This is what you want for us all is it,mein fuhurer?       You should be forced to live there then , and they should live in your house!

Don’t misunderstand , I was there once!

Don’t you think you should tackle the social education of adults and youth , before the forced implementation of slums .These groups need a major education in  becoming social members of society and the erradication of the need to rebel , attainable goals , the vicious cycle must be broken!

They are unhappy , got it?   And you are breeding the cycle !  This is your legacy . And as for you Gordon fleisher Baum , I wouldn’t know where to start.

One thing to remember , I believe it was Khrushchev ,who said in order for communism to work it must be global , and every social member must love the party and the common good and nothing else.

Hence the cold war  and the dissolutions of religions.

Let’s take over the world when they’re not looking!

Posted by Louis on September 8th, 2008

Russians have planted a sign on the sea floor under the North pole to claim it as theirs!

Really no-one should lay claim to international waters . Who says it’s theirs to claim ! What’s next , someone laying claim to the center of the Atlantic , so that no-one may pass without paying a toll , or fly their planes over ,

Really what’s to stop anyone from doing just this? Included is the sea coastlines grab , up to 200 miles , just in case there is oil or any other resource there.

How can you claim sea? So if you wandered in to it with your little boat , what? you get shot out of the water?

Yes < Iknow , it is claimed that this is just rights , but who decodes to what extent rights go to. In the UK , the governement introduced a law , to use covert surveillance for catching terrorists , later this law was used to install camera to watch people loiterring , or dumping rubbish , or just about any thing the council wanted it for ! The UK governement introduced a Road Fund LIcense , as a yearly charge to offset the cost of road building . Later this charge , annually increased to subsidise unrelated projects , or at least tenuously related.

The police powers to hold terror suspects for 3 months without charge ,will be used for everyone sooner or later. Police power for suspects , and stop and search ,so many innocent people , myself included,forcibly detained , for hours , for not carrying id , just credit cards and contract phone. The systems are open to abuse by those with power and force , and the extra fascist powers they claim or are endowed. Police , government , whoever can they be trusted?

Isaiah Berlin was strongly opposed to authority and government intervention in personal freedoms.And that power should be severly controlled , without forced coersion, freedom!

Adolf Blair wrote a letter to Berlin”….surely,…it doesn’t mean that the left can’t have the confidence to fight against authority , intollerance and hierachy , and build a more equal society..” , though by the very nature of the socialist state and his own low intelligence and high self opinion , he pushed for the opposite of what he wrote , with excessive laws , intollerance against the populus , and his own elevation ,and those many of the labour party,to the status of a King.

Though acceptable for the right wing conservatives, not acceptable to be a 4 mansion owner, if you are a socialist, how can you trust the views of a man whose core beliefs are eroded when the financial gain enters the picture . Power Corrupts Or Just a Good Lie Teller

My point: hypocrites and lies , can you really trust any governments , or police forces( the government puppets)? Just because they say black is white , it is still black!

Do governments bring freedom through order , or rule us like gods?

Isaiah Berlin

Too much rain , lots of floods, global warming or not !

Posted by Louis on September 7th, 2008

So much rain , flash floods everywhere! Ice caps are melting , virtually all gone now . So much so , that the Russians have managed to plant a flag on the sea bed under the North pole to claim the sea bed as theirs!

Global warming is to blame ,for sure , But are humans to blame? 100 years ago the river Thames, Serpentine, in London , would freeze over and people would skate over it for fun.

100 Years ago the south coast of England , grew a wide variety of grapes for wine making!

The Romans Grew grapes in England . On building London’s Trafalgar Square , the workers found Skeletons , teeth and other remnants of , lions , tigers , hippopotamuses and various other animals from the hotter climates ! Proof that , for some considerable time , London was a savannah .

So what, you say? Well the natural conclusion is that the weather is very changeable , not only day to day but century to century , and 10 millenia to 10 millenia .

Is the Earth closer to the sun , are the mountains too high , has the sea changed undercurrents, is the moons getting too far away? Who knows for sure!

Though one thing is certain……We did this bit! What do I mean ?….The clean air laws did this!

Particulate matter suspended in the atmosphere caused global dimming , which meant the Earth had less sunlight entering the depths of the atmosphere and causing less heat . Now the air is cleaner , 100% of the light can now fully heat the sea and land without hinderance!

If we had left the atmoshere alone we wouldn’t be having the disaster now!

You are not the first , or the last , to have meant the best , but incurred the worst ” W.Shakespeare

Theme designed by Team Creativesa Website Design and DevelopmentOutsourcing Company Brought by Wordpress Themes.